The World’s Most Advanced End-to-End In Silico Platform for Rigorous Science-Backed Drug Development

Optimizing pre-clinical, clinical and post-approval decisions

Operating at the Intersection of Scientific Innovation and Regulatory Standards

Scientific innovation

Access to cutting-edge, validated research, and technologies through a broad global network of partners

Regulatory standards

FDA, EMA and industry, compliance + contributors to the development of emerging good practice frameworks

Including ‘Toward Good Simulation Practice’

(Co-authored with the U.S. FDA)

Make earlier, safer decisions with less time, cost, and risk

De-risk every stage from preclinical to post-approval

Decreased reliance on in vivo studies and early human exposure, consistent with FDA initiatives encouraging alternatives to traditional animal testing.

Time and Cost Saving

Preclinical mAb optimization (end-to-end)​
12–30 months;
$15 – 30M
Biosimilarity confirmation
1–2 years;
$10 – 30M
Phase 3 ADC optimization
6–18 months;
$20 – 50M
Long-term MS strategy
3–5 years;
$50 – 150M
Rare disease trials
1–2 years;
$10 – 40M
In-licensing BD RWE + synthetic trials
6–9 months;
$5 – 20M (risk avoidance) RWE + synthetic trials

A Unified Data Integration Framework Powering Multi-Modal Data at Global Scale

Subtitle here

Continuous optimisation loop

InSilicoTrials accelerates drug development by integrating mechanistic models, AI, digital twins, synthetic data, and operations forecasting into one platform.

Enables clinical trial simulation, including synthetic patient generation and scenario comparisons: dosing, sample size, I/E criteria, adaptive designs, statistical methods

Includes Model Library, Data Library, data Integrator, Workflow Builder, Clinical Trial Simulator, Output Dashboard

Supports safety, efficacy, biomarkers, disease progression, QSP, multi-omics, in vitro/in vivo, and AI/ML models

AI support for external information seeking through a multi-agent archite cture that connects tools, internal information, external information, and the simulation platform

Searches external sources (e.g., clinicaltrials.gov) to suggest clinical trial designs

Interprets data, makes recommendations, and analyses simulation results

Independently launches new simulations based on retrieved information and user preferences

Enables clinical trial simulation, including synthetic patient generation and scenario comparisons: dosing, sample size, I/E criteria, adaptive designs, statistical methods

Includes Model Library, Data Library, data Integrator, Workflow Builder, Clinical Trial Simulator, Output Dashboard

Supports safety, efficacy, biomarkers, disease progression, QSP, multi-omics, in vitro/in vivo, and AI/ML models

Scientific
Platform

Operations
Platform

IRIS:
Multi-agentic Simulation Workflow Orchestration

Awards

ARPA-H CATALYST - CARDIOVERSE digital-twin program
FDA’s GenAI Precision Challenge Top 5 Winner
EU Virtual Human Twin initiative
London AI Summit Winner
Grind AI Startup of the Year Winner

ARPA-H CATALYST - CARDIOVERSE digital-twin program

FDA’s GenAI Precision Challenge Top 5 Winner

London AI Summit Winner

Grind AI Startup of the Year Winner

Flagship Cases

Challenge

A development team needed to optimise a monoclonal antibody’s design and dosing before entering animal
studies, reducing wet-lab iteration cycles and early development risk.

Therapeutic Area:

Monoclonal antibody programmes. Preclinical.

Tech:

Mechanistic PK/PD and TMDD modelling, AI-assisted simulation, virtual patients

Savings:

12 – 30 months and $15 – 30M

Approach

AI-assisted Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) modelling
Simulation of clearance, affinity, and dosing frequency scenarios
Virtual patient simulations to predict exposure and target engagement.

Result

Identified an optimised antibody variant with improved affinity, reduced clearance, and
stronger target suppression through in-silico experimentation.

Value

Accelerated preclinical optimisation
Reduced reliance on in vivo studies
Increased confidence before first-in-human studies.

Challenge

Ultra-small patient populations made traditional ALS trial designs underpowered, slow,
and ethically challenging.

Therapeutic Area:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Phase II.

Tech:

ML disease-progression models, synthetic control arms, causal inference

Savings:

1 – 2 years and $10 – 40M

Approach

AML-based modelling of ALS disease progression
Generation of synthetic control patients
Causal inference to enable unbiased treatment comparisons.

Result

Augmented the control arm with 60 synthetic patients, increasing statistical power
while reducing the number of patients assigned to placebo.

Value

Improved trial feasibility in rare disease settings
Reduced patient burden
Faster, more confident go/no-go decisions.

Challenge

A large pharma organisation needed to optimise the dosing strategy for an antibody – drug conjugate,
balancing exposure, tumor control, and thrombocytopenia risk.

Therapeutic Area:

Oncology (ADC). Phase III design.

Tech:

QSP digital twins, PK/PD, tumour growth and safety modelling, PoS simulation

Savings:

6 – 18 months and $2 – 50M

Approach

Multi-scale digital twins linking PK, tumor dynamics, and platelet counts
ML and causal comparisons of fixed vs. adaptive dosing
Probability of Success (PoS) modeling across virtual populations.

Result

Revealed the optimal weekly regimen with superior efficacy and acceptable safety
trade-offs, guiding Phase 3 strategy.

Value

AI-augmented decision-making for pivotal trials
Higher PoS and smarter resource allocation
Quantified benefit–risk trade-offs before investing in large trials.

Challenge

A pharma team needed to evaluate long-term dosing strategies and safety outcomes without conducting
multi-year clinical trials.

Therapeutic Area:

Multiple Sclerosis. Label extension phase.

Tech:

QSP immune-system modelling, long-term (5-year) clinical trial simulation

Savings:

3 – 5 years and $50 – 150M

Approach

QSP modelling of immune response and lymphocyte dynamics
Simulation of relapse rates across virtual MS populations
Long-horizon (5-year) treatment strategy evaluation.

Result

Identified an optimised antibody variant with improved affinity, reduced clearance, and
stronger target suppression through in-silico experimentation.

Value

Evidence to support label extension without new long-term trials
Reduced development time and cost
Improved understanding of long-term benefit–risk profiles.

From the Blog

July 21, 2025

Synthetic Data for Rare Subgroups – A Decision-Grade Tool to Inform Drug Development

Read Article

July 14, 2025

Synthetic Data – Are We All Talking About the Same Thing?

Read Article

Scientific Platform

Enables clinical trial simulation, including synthetic patient generation and scenario comparisons: dosing, sample size, I/E criteria, adaptive designs, statistical methods

Includes Model Library, Data Library, data Integrator, Workflow Builder, Clinical Trial Simulator, Output Dashboard

Supports safety, efficacy, biomarkers, disease progression, QSP, multi-omics, in vitro/in vivo, and AI/ML models

Operations Platform

Enables clinical trial simulation, including synthetic patient generation and scenario comparisons: dosing, sample size, I/E criteria, adaptive designs, statistical methods

Includes Model Library, Data Library, data Integrator, Workflow Builder, Clinical Trial Simulator, Output Dashboard

Supports safety, efficacy, biomarkers, disease progression, QSP, multi-omics, in vitro/in vivo, and AI/ML models

IRIS: Multi-agentic Simulation Workflow Orchestration

AI support for external information seeking through a multi-agent archite cture that connects tools, internal information, external information, and the simulation platform

Searches external sources (e.g., clinicaltrials.gov) to suggest clinical trial designs

Interprets data, makes recommendations, and analyses simulation results

Independently launches new simulations based on retrieved information and user preferences

In Silico Antibody Optimisation

Challenge

A development team needed to optimise a monoclonal antibody’s design and dosing before entering animal
studies, reducing wet-lab iteration cycles and early development risk.

Therapeutic Area:

Monoclonal antibody programmes. Preclinical.

Tech:

Mechanistic PK/PD and TMDD modelling, AI-assisted simulation, virtual patients

Savings:

12 – 30 months and $15 – 30M

Approach

AI-assisted Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) modelling
Simulation of clearance, affinity, and dosing frequency scenarios
Virtual patient simulations to predict exposure and target engagement.

Result

Identified an optimised antibody variant with improved affinity, reduced clearance, and
stronger target suppression through in-silico experimentation.

Value

Accelerated preclinical optimisation
Reduced reliance on in vivo studies
Increased confidence before first-in-human studies.

ALS Synthetic Control Arm​

Challenge

Ultra-small patient populations made traditional ALS trial designs underpowered, slow,
and ethically challenging.

Therapeutic Area:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Phase II.

Tech:

ML disease-progression models, synthetic control arms, causal inference

Savings:

1 – 2 years and $10 – 40M

Approach

AML-based modelling of ALS disease progression
Generation of synthetic control patients
Causal inference to enable unbiased treatment comparisons.

Result

Augmented the control arm with 60 synthetic patients, increasing statistical power
while reducing the number of patients assigned to placebo.

Value

Improved trial feasibility in rare disease settings
Reduced patient burden
Faster, more confident go/no-go decisions.

Oncology: Phase 3 ADC Digital twin Optimisation​

Challenge

A large pharma organisation needed to optimise the dosing strategy for an antibody – drug conjugate,
balancing exposure, tumor control, and thrombocytopenia risk.

Therapeutic Area:

Oncology (ADC). Phase III design.

Tech:

QSP digital twins, PK/PD, tumour growth and safety modelling, PoS simulation

Savings:

6 – 18 months and $2 – 50M

Approach

Multi-scale digital twins linking PK, tumor dynamics, and platelet counts
ML and causal comparisons of fixed vs. adaptive dosing
Probability of Success (PoS) modeling across virtual populations.

Result

Revealed the optimal weekly regimen with superior efficacy and acceptable safety
trade-offs, guiding Phase 3 strategy.

Value

AI-augmented decision-making for pivotal trials
Higher PoS and smarter resource allocation
Quantified benefit–risk trade-offs before investing in large trials.

MS 5-Year QSP Digital Twin

Challenge

A pharma team needed to evaluate long-term dosing strategies and safety outcomes without conducting
multi-year clinical trials.

Therapeutic Area:

Multiple Sclerosis. Label extension phase.

Tech:

QSP immune-system modelling, long-term (5-year) clinical trial simulation

Savings:

3 – 5 years and $50 – 150M

Approach

QSP modelling of immune response and lymphocyte dynamics
Simulation of relapse rates across virtual MS populations
Long-horizon (5-year) treatment strategy evaluation.

Result

Identified an optimised antibody variant with improved affinity, reduced clearance, and
stronger target suppression through in-silico experimentation.

Value

Evidence to support label extension without new long-term trials
Reduced development time and cost
Improved understanding of long-term benefit–risk profiles.